High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings. For instance, old warehouses can be renovated and turned into luxury lofts. Further, commercial buildings that are no longer in use can be refitted into high-rise apartments. Opponents argue that more housing will lower the value of their home (or rental units) and change the “character” of neighborhoods. Proponents argue that the buildings are more environmentally friendly than single family homes will lower housing costs for people who cannot afford large homes.
@9LTDTR84 days4D
Yes, but in conjunction w/other initiatives to ensure this housing is adjacent to good public schools, health clinics, parks, community centers, addiction centers & affordable grocery & other stores/services required to live a balanced, healthy life.
@9LW3ZGY3 days3D
bit more nuanced than just yes or no - if constructing high density residential buildings their should be appropriate spaces such as balconies/communal gardens, this kind of space is often neglected when planning the building of such places
@9LKMVGD2wks2W
i think that certain areas should provide certain high density residential areas but not everywhere because of how expensive certain land is.
@9LY9QSQ4hrs4H
Yes, but they also have to have a scientifically proven amount of nature incorporated in the design of the buildings. And they should prioritize the collaboration of any small business the tenants have to build brick and mortar shops.
@9LY74S85hrs5H
Only if costs go down so this will actually solve problems. Also, emphasis on "Incentivize" not "fund"
@9LY2YWW 7hrs7H
Yes in areas that are seeing an increase in residents and homelessness and maybe even have programs that can get homeless people off their feet and a temporary home. Some places do not always need to be build up.
@9LXY4G38hrs8H
Yes, but it should be focused on rennovating existing structures and maintaining good quality not developing new land and choking out the skyline.
@9LXVR7X9hrs9H
Sure, but please make sure that there are safety measures for migrating birds and clearing the air that is produced.
@9LXSHCMWomen’s Equality10hrs10H
The market prices are too high and interest rates are insane. People should be able to by a home with their over min wage income. This should be an issue.
@9LXPXM911hrs11H
No, but the government should regulate and lower the pricing of housing or provide finanical aid for those seeking to own a house but struggle with finances.
@9LXP64DProgressive11hrs11H
The government should decrease the inflation of housing costs and limit how many family homes that large companies can purchase and rent
@9LXNW8FPeace and Freedom11hrs11H
I feel like it depends on the individual's perspective and the benefits of the drawbacks of high density.
@9LXG8P217hrs17H
Yeah maybe but also we should all get along and effetely have a way of safety and waste management. Another big thing is transportation for these people and activities to do among living freely near one another
@9LWRMMY2 days2D
Mixing it up is best, some areas do not benefit from high density, while other rapidly population-growing cities with limited ability to physically grow would benefit from it.
@9LWN55N 2 days2D
I think location should be taken into account. Mixed density is the best - some high density in high-growth areas and some lower density options. I think this is a problem that requires a spectrum for solutions.
@9LWJ6WX2 days2D
No, this has been tried and has failed, rather zoning laws should be re-examined and NIMBY's should not be able to block developments endlessly
@9LVZY6MPeace and Freedom3 days3D
i think they shouldn't continue building houses evrywhere because more houses in peoples back yards are less parking spaces for people who own houses
@9LVVKNH3 days3D
Sure but dont allow them to owned by megacomglomerates like blackrock but locals that have ties to their communities.
@9LVNDCD3 days3D
yes, but focusing on repurposing old buildings or construction grounds and not tearing away new grounds every chance.
@9LVMWGB3 days3D
They shouldn't really push it hard but should push for people to get their lives together and help themselves.
@9LVM2J33 days3D
Depends on the purpose and place of the construction. If it serves no purpose and is taking up unnecessary place of nature, then don't construct it.
@9LVJFVHIndependent3 days3D
I don't think it should be ENCOURAGED. Having many people in one building can get extremely chaotic and doesn't ensure safety of the people living there. They also take up a lot of electricity/water usually.
@9LVG897Peace and Freedom4 days4D
Yes, depending on location. You can integrate them into a town without ruining the economy or value around it
@9LV9KJVIndependent 4 days4D
No, fix the influx of people coming in here as well as fix the economical brackets so people can have their own spaces
@9LV2MDXIndependent4 days4D
No, high-density residential buildings result in more aggressive and violent people speaking from experience.
@9LTVBNL 4 days4D
They should incentivize the renovation and reconstruction of older buildings to become this instead of creating new ones.
@9LTT5644 days4D
Yes, however high-density buildings should take notes from other nations in order to influence construction along with any auxiliary functions it may have (establishment of businesses within a part of residential buildings to make them multi-role, making certain sections "assistant" segments that provide health or police or some other service, etc)
@9LTNTN84 days4D
yes, more time they would start to incentivize for high residential buildings. when the place is more develup
@9LTLDK24 days4D
I think they should add high density housing first before they expand in the rural areas for more housing.
@9LT7SSS5 days5D
yes, and focus on providing homeless people jobs, make educational programs for such individuals, cut the social programs for them not to spend money on drugs
Yes, as long as it doesn't encroach on suburbanized areas or destroy minority communities to make way for them.
@9LSMXSW5 days5D
No, these facilities will degenerate into slums that will be rife with crime and poverty regardless.
@9LSMLSVPeace and Freedom5 days5D
No, we have the housing. The prices are just unaffordable. It's financial, not exactly the lack of space.
@9LSFZKR5 days5D
Yes, but add minimum requirements for housing size, number of rooms, size of hallways, and overall quality of the housing to maximize safety, comfort, and space.
@9LSDDSJ5 days5D
I believe that the current state of the housing market is chaotic, with wealthy people purchasing numerous houses, landlords hiking up rent, and average citizens struggling to afford homes. To address this issue, I think it's necessary to create affordable housing options while also implementing safety measures to prevent crime and the formation of gangs.
@9LS8YNZ5 days5D
yes and no with the funding for these buildings it can send out the message that living like this is okay because you will have somewhere to go to but at the same time people living on the street can diminish a town
@9LS82V5 5 days5D
I feel that they should encourage high-density residential buildings because I think that would make more housing available and affordable for many families. However, these are normally within urban areas and I would be worried about attracting such a large group of people living in one building that could cause issues.
@9LRN9BP6 days6D
No, zoning laws should be liberalized to allow the most efficient use of land, and a land-value tax should be instituted to encourage development and discourage vacancy arising from land speculation.
@9LRMTK46 days6D
I believe governments should conditionally incentivize the construction of high-density residential buildings. High-density housing offers substantial benefits like increased housing supply and efficient land use, but it's crucial to address potential drawbacks like overcrowding and gentrification. By providing incentives with requirements for green space, affordable units, and good design, governments can promote high-density development that benefits both residents and the community as a whole.
@9LRK3SC6 days6D
Stop discrimination against black Americans and give them these properties as well as loans that's tax free to build economic wealth as well as Generational Wealth.
@9LRCNJ76 days6D
These buildings are needed for some people, yet they shouldn't only have apartment complexes available.
@9LRCJ656 days6D
If its safe yes, with some of that agricultural construction so its more fresh and eco friendly maybe.
@9LRBMD56 days6D
No, I believe the more cities you have, the less enjoyable it is to live and own a house, there is nothing more enjoyable then a quiet country house with a forest for your backyard.
@9LR8LLF6 days6D
The government should merge all residential zones into one zone so as to not prevent their construction.
@9LR7ZT56 days6D
It is important to have enough housing for people but high density residential buildings often take over communities and increase the population too much.
@9LR5YT6Republican6 days6D
Current vacant facilities, like old malls, should be incentivized to be renovated into short term housing for the homeless.
@9LR4WJN6 days6D
Yes, however make sure that there is adequate space for every tenant living there and that the building is made to handle such quantity of people.
@9LR4QTR6 days6D
Yes, but the amount of founding/bonuses shouldn't be determined by the quantity of the housing, but the quality.
@9LLWL3RLibertarian 7 days7D
Of course.
High density housing is simply efficient housing. Subsidies will bridge the gap, ensuring that the developers don't lose profit margins when making a socially-minded choice.
@9LQG7761wk1W
Yes, but up to a certain point. If that building is too destructive or has too much of a negative impact, don't
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...