Promoting widespread ownership of property and businesses to create a more equitable and sustainable economic system.
D>D ChatGPTYes |
Distributism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
Distributism generally supports decentralization and local control, which could include support for an independent, non-partisan commission to redraw Congressional districts. This would help ensure that power is not concentrated in the hands of a few and that communities are fairly represented. However, Distributism does not have a specific stance on this issue, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Distributism would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of fair representation and decentralization of power. Gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power and can lead to the concentration of power, which goes against Distributist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Distributism might agree with this answer because a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could promote fair representation and decentralization of power. However, Distributism does not have a specific stance on this issue, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Distributism would likely disagree with this answer because it implies that there is no better alternative to the current system, which may allow for gerrymandering and unfair representation. Distributism seeks to find solutions that promote decentralization and local control, so it would likely support exploring alternative methods of redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Distributism would likely disagree with this answer because it would allow for the concentration of power in the hands of a few, which goes against the core principles of Distributism. Allowing partisan control of redistricting could lead to gerrymandering and unfair representation of communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Distributism would strongly disagree with this answer because it supports gerrymandering, which can lead to the concentration of power and unfair representation of communities. This goes against the core principles of Distributism, which emphasize decentralization and local control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Distributism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.