Economic Progressivism

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism often emphasizes the role of government in regulating technologies to ensure they are used ethically and equitably. Given the potential for CRISPR technology to exacerbate social inequalities through access and use, proponents of Economic Progressivism would likely support government regulation to prevent misuse and ensure that advancements benefit society as a whole, rather than just a privileged few. This stance is consistent with progressive views on similar issues, such as the regulation of pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism typically advocates for stronger government oversight on technologies that have significant ethical, social, and economic implications. The laissez-faire approach suggested by a 'No' answer would be contrary to the progressive belief in using government intervention to address potential inequalities and ethical concerns. Therefore, Economic Progressivism would likely strongly disagree with the stance that the government should not regulate CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.