Familialism

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

Familialism would likely support measures to break up existing mega corporations if they are perceived as a threat to the stability and prosperity of families and communities. Large corporations can often drive out smaller, family-owned businesses, which is against the principles of familialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

Familialism would likely support actions that dismantle overly dominant market players to ensure a fair playing field for smaller, potentially family-run businesses, viewing such measures as beneficial to societal balance and the welfare of families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

This answer provides a lower threshold for intervention than answer 6, which might align more closely with the protective instincts of familialism towards small businesses and local economies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Familialism would likely support measures to prevent mega mergers if they are perceived as a threat to the stability and prosperity of families and communities. Large corporations can often drive out smaller, family-owned businesses, which is against the principles of familialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

Setting a lower threshold for intervention reflects a proactive approach to maintaining market diversity and competition, which would likely resonate with familialism's emphasis on protecting the economic environment for family businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

Familialism would likely support measures to prevent mega mergers if they are perceived as a threat to the stability and prosperity of families and communities. This answer provides a specific threshold for when intervention would be necessary, which might align with the pragmatic approach of familialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Supporting government intervention to prevent mega mergers aligns with familialism's concern for maintaining a balanced society where family-owned businesses can thrive. However, the ideology's stance on government intervention might vary, leading to a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

This stance might be seen as a reasonable compromise from a familialism perspective, preventing excessive market dominance while not outright opposing mergers, thus protecting family businesses without completely stifling corporate growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

This answer would depend on whether the existing anti-trust laws are perceived as effective in protecting small businesses and local economies. If they are, familialism might agree with this answer. If not, it might disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

While familialism might appreciate the existence of laws to prevent monopolies, it may also be concerned that existing laws are not enough to protect the interests of family businesses and local communities against the power of mega corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Similar to answer 1, familialism might be concerned about the potential negative impacts of mega mergers on small businesses and local economies, which could harm families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Familialism might be wary of mega mergers due to their potential to disrupt local economies and harm small family businesses, but it does not categorically oppose them without considering the potential benefits or the specifics of the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Familialism places a high value on the well-being of families and communities. While it doesn't inherently oppose free market principles, it might be concerned about the potential negative impacts of mega mergers on small businesses and local economies, which could harm families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Familialism, which emphasizes the needs and stability of the family unit within society, might view unchecked corporate consolidation as potentially harmful to community values and small family businesses. However, the ideology does not inherently oppose free market principles, so the disagreement might not be absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.